Ford Kuga vs Ford Mondeo Comparison. Overview. Specs. Pin. 2019 Ford Kuga 1.5 GTDI EcoBoost RM 164,888. Pin. 2018 Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost RM 189,086. The size of the vehicles is a vital thing to compare. It's actually worth matching motors of the models.Regarding acceleration, Ford Kuga speeds from 0 to 60 mph for 8.6 sec while Audi Q5 needs 11 sec . It's needed to remember that the maximum speed of Kuga is 184 km/h / 114 mph while Q5 will drive at 213 km/h / 132 mph. Ford Kuga vs Renault Captur Comparison. Overview. Specs. Pin. 2019 Ford Kuga 1.5 GTDI EcoBoost RM 164,888. Pin. 2017 Renault Captur TCe 120 EDC (CKD) RM 107,695. It is inevitable, comparing the recently-introduced 2021 Toyota Corolla Cross against one of the most popular SUVs around – the Proton X70. After all, seeing that the price of the top-spec Proton X70 is very close to the entry-level Toyota Corolla Cross (RM 123k vs RM 124k), cross-shopping between the two is bound to happen. The Ford Kuga has a length of 4614 mm, a height of 1666 mm, a width of 1883 mm without the exterior mirrors and a measurement of 2178 millimeters with the mirrors unfolded. The boot capacity varies between 475 - 645 liters depending on the position of the sliding rear seats, to allow more space for the second-row passengers or luggage volume. Side View Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 vs. Hyundai Tucson (NX4E) SUV 2020. Technical specs | Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 is 11.4 cm longer and 1.1 cm higher compared to Hyundai Tucson (NX4E) SUV 2020. It has 2.1 cm more ground clearance and offers 13% less cargo space. 4,5. 461.4 cm. +11.4. Length. . Overview Bike Forum Chat Forum Members Forum Forum Help This topic has 31 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by thisisnotaspoon. Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total) Kuga v Cmax v Grand Cmax – help me decide New car time and looking for either hands on experience or informed enlightenment. I have a 10 year old Mondeo and whilst it’s a nice car to drive and has good gadgets I’ve never really got on with it over 8 years of owning it, like I did with the Focus I had before it. I think I’ve narrowed down my lack of like for it to its size. I find it too long. I have to park on side streets near work and I don’t think that’s helping much so I’m wanting to get a smaller car this time around, but I have a family to fit in. Kids are 6 and 8, and as I intend to keep this car for another 6-8 years again this car needs to fit teenagers in at some point. It needs to have a big enough boot for stuff we use at the moment like bikes etc. Anyone got any nuggets of advice? Anyone got any of these and have a similar scenario to me? How do you find them etc etc? Posted 5 years ago Despised our CMAX, worst car I’ve ever owned and was glad to be rid of it though we had loads of trouble with the engine. Size wise it was adequate for me, my wife and our two boys at the time along with their bikes in the ample boot. A more modern version would no doubt be a worthy purchase and it wasn’t overly big either, same footprint as a focus if I remember correctly?? Posted 5 years ago We find the C-max big enough for our needs – family of four, camping trips to France with bikes etc. We use a roof box and a towbar rack as needed. It’s no harder to park than a Focus but is bigger inside. You could look at the Focus estate as well. I drove it to the Alps overnight a couple of years back and it was absolutely fine. Posted 5 years ago How do you find the Cmax in the back for the kids? Knee room ok? Our neighbours had a focus and said the legroom in the back was not enough for their 8 year old so changed it for a Mazda 6. Posted 5 years ago Advertisements We have a petrol Grand Cmax. It’s slow to accelerate but once it’s going is great . Loads of usable space and is shorter than a mondeo which we previously had. Great rear leg room (at least a foot)though I did take out the third row of seats so we could have a spare wheel. Love the sliding doors. Our next car will be another one. Posted 5 years ago We had a 53 regarding CMAX, it was OK, nice place to be but the air con died and the petrol was a thirsty beast. We had a look at the new ones over the summer and thought the space was good, but the interior was a bit low rent. Brand new ones might be better though Posted 5 years ago How do you find the Cmax in the back for the kids? Knee room ok? I’ve sat in the back and it seems ok. Having said that, I’m not tall so it might be a squeeze if the front seats are pushed right back. The rear seats do slide back but that eats into boot space so I don’t tend to bother – my kids are too young for it to be an issue anyway. One thing that I like – the individually removeable rear seats mean I can carry the two kids and fit my bike between them (with the wheels off). Posted 5 years ago Wife’s 08 plate CMax was worst car we’ve had, even more unreliable than the Scenic it replaced. Bought ex-demo nearly new and we sold it when the warranty ran out. petrol and it averaged 24mpg over the 30k miles. Many many parts were replaced under warranty and it broke down a few times. Replaced with a Soul which has been better in every way. Not much boot space so for the OP question, I’d be looking at Kia/Hyundai options with 5/7 year warranty Posted 5 years ago 24mpg!!!! Our LWB T5 converted van gets 34mpg. We’ve just changed from a Focus estate which averaged 53mpg over 6 years (mileage against actual fuel use). Posted 5 years ago On my second cmax both from new. First was a 61 plate petrol. Was nice but lacked a bit of acceleration did about 28k in two years but turned it over for another 63 plate diesel which has a lot more acceleration. I get 48mpg out of it according to the trip computer which I’ve checked. I’m on 40k in three years on this car. I have two teenagers and regularly head off camping and carry 4 bikes on a tow bar rack. I usually use a roof box when camping. It all fits in along with the four of us who are all adult sized with wriggle room. I regularly stick two bikes in the boot (with all seats in but two lifted) in order to go riding with my son. It will fit a single bike in the boot with all seats up. Funnily enough I’ve been thinking about what I would replace it with and come up with …… well, if I was desperate to change model then a Focus estate, and if I really didn’t want to go Ford again then maybe a civic estate? I did want a Kuga but they were tiny inside and a grand cmax was just too much of a franken car to my eyes 🙂 Posted 5 years ago Have you considered the B-Max? It’s Fiesta based, instead of Focus, it’s neatest feature are the sliding rear doors, which allow better access to the rear seats, along with a big rear hatch. I’ve driven two so far, and they were really fun to drive, had heated screens and various other nice bits and bobs. Nice driving position and great on twisty roads. I’ll be driving a Grand C-Max tomorrow, so it’ll be interesting to do a bit of a comparison, although the B-Max was a 13-plate and the C-Max is a 16-plate. Posted 5 years ago Just bought a 14 plate cmax (non grand) From 2010 onwards is the current shape, and this year they did a facelift but essentially same I think I would agree the interior is not quite vw feel, go for the titanium for better stereo and gadgets. The basic zetec spec is not that great. Not sure about the kuga, just don’t want an SUV at all so I didn’t look at it. I expect it’s not as roomy as the cmax though Also worth looking at the touran but expect to pay £5k more. I much preferred the drive of the cmax over the touran which feels more bus like, because it is! So far I’m enjoying the cmax. I’ve got the ecoboost which is surprisingly nippy. Mpg is a bit disappointing, best I’m getting is about 35 around town and 45 on motorway so nowhere near the claimed figures. Otherwise it’s a great car, fingers crossed it’ll i won’t need the warranty! Posted 5 years ago Good to see there are some good things regarding the Cmax and space etc. I can’t see me ever needing to pack camping stuff as my wife hates it. Caravans might be different but camping is a no go. Hopefully the boot will be big enough for all our stuff. I’ve had 3 Ford’s and so has my wife so I’m fully aware the quality isn’t perfect but it’s good enough for us I think. Titanium spec might be a good option though. Posted 5 years ago Kuga is way smaller inside and in the boot than the size of the car seems to be… seats felt quite stiff/firm and not as plush as the Mondeos. Posted 5 years ago I quite like my wife’s 57 plate cmax four our family of 4 + dog. petrol is quite thirsty and costs a fortune to tax but so far it has been reliable, and we’ll keep it ’til it dies I think. We have to park in the street and the small size is a bonus. I’ve got a 99 VW T4 and the cmax is a pleasure to drive compared to that! Posted 5 years ago How tall are your kids? The leg room in the back of the Kuga is not great. Also, the mk1 has a narrow boot entry so it’s had to get wide things into it. It’s a great 2-person car, not so sure for a family. Posted 5 years ago Similar thought processes resulted in me getting a Yeti which I am very happy with. Posted 5 years ago we have a 60 plate C-Max zetec we’ve had it for 3 years and its been good so far. economy wise the best i’ve managed out of it is about 39mpg…if its driven enthusiastically then that drops down to about 35mppg its not the highest spec…rear windows are manual..no cruise control or bluetooth…but its does us just fine drives like a car and doesnt feel mpv-ish even though the seating position is higher than a normal car as for boot space…thats quite big and the access to it is very good…low lip on the sill, which is wide enough to sit on too. the only issue i have with it is getting the bike in the back…small/med frame size with 26″ wheels the rear seats are a funny design…you have to fold the backs of the seats down and then lift the whole seat forward and then use the bungees to secure it to the front seat…with the seats in that position you loose about 18″ of boot space…you can of course take the whole seat out if you have somewhere to store them but as it is the only way the bike fits in the boot is upside down, with the wheels off and with the seats folded ours is in panther black with the privacy glass which makes it look pretty cool…but just be aware that reverse parking on very dark nights or in poorly lit areas can be a bit of a pain Posted 5 years ago mudshark – Member Similar thought processes resulted in me getting a Yeti which I am very happy with. I’ve been down that route but only the Ford’s have the quickclear front screen which is amazing. Posted 5 years ago I recently bought a 2015 Cmax Easy. Diesel. So far so good. My stepdaughter is 16 and 5′ 10″ and has no complaint on back seat space. She complains about many things constantly but nothing about the car so I imagine she’s happy there. Plenty spacious for 4 of us going away for a weekend. I love the park assist as I’m a bloody hopeless parker and in Vienna it’s amazing parking on the street. I didn’t buy air pressure sensors for my winter wheels so the dash has an error message saying I’ve got 4 flat wheels but I can live with that. I was rear ended but a young girl. Her car just crumbled whereas the Cmax was hardly damaged at all. Posted 5 years ago That’s what’s supposed to happen. Posted 5 years ago You see a lot of CMax and BMax and come to that SMax’s around my way. Theres a massive Ford dealership near Portsmouth that knocks em’ out, always a sale or event going on throughout the year. I’d suggest you look at those large independent dealerships too, my 5 mins looking around a couple down here revealed vehicles ex-demo or with <7k on the clock can be had for £6-7k off list.. Bargain. Posted 5 years ago CountZero – would be nice to hear what your thoughts after driving the Grand Cmax are…. Posted 5 years ago We’ve had a grand cmax for about two years now and love it. I’ve got two tall boys, 5 and 9, and I’m 6 foot. With the rear seats right back there’s plenty of room in the back even with me driving, boot is good too. Used the extra seats a reasonable amount with taking kids and friends to places etc, can fit adults in too but you wouldn’t want to spend too long on them as they are quite small. Bootspace wise, it’s very tall, a little narrower than our previous 55 focus. We got the cargo net with it which give loads of extra room as you can ram it to roof. We do a lot of camping and it’s been great. Main thing for us is that the boys have a lot of space so very happy on long journeys. Sliding rear doors are amazing, no longer worry about narrow parking spaces as can always get the kids out. We got a titanium spec model as it just had the extras we wanted. Stereo is really good too. Down sides, boot isn’t as big as you might expect, especially when compared to bigger smax and virtually non existent with rear seats up. You do lose quite a bit for those rear seats and they cannot be taken is low compared to what you might expect as it’s a heavy car. We have the 2l diesel and average about 45mpg. But it pulls very well and doesn’t seem to notice when loaded with camping gear, roof box and bikes. All in all, we think it’s the best family car we’ve had and would get another one happily. Posted 5 years ago Ive a c-max (06 plate) Its big enough, but the rear seats dont fold flat so the boot isnt actually that big in terms of getting bikes in which is a PITA. So I have a towbar and a bike rack. Rear legroom is huge, as is headroom. And the outer 2 seats slide back too if you want full on lime levels of legroom. And my grandparents love it as the seats are taller/upright so getting in isnt a contortion for people 6ft tall with hip replacements (or just cold mountainbikers trying to get bikes and bodies in the back). Its the older (non turbo, non vct) petrol, dash is cuttently showing 44mpg (mostly motorway at an indicated 70). Drops to mid 30’s for commuting/town use. The petrol is a lot thirstier and barely more peowerfull in real life as its a small version of the bigger duratec engine (the is/was the biggest itteration of the smaller sigma engine). Reliability wise, the only failure was a power steering hose fixed under warrenty. And Ive serviced it on my driveway for the past 60,000 miles apart from the cambelt. So all its cost me is tyres and the cabelt service which is pretty good going for a 10 year old car! Posted 5 years ago I have a MkI Kuga Titanium AWD and I really like it. Boot isn’t as big as a Mondeo’s but then again how many cars are? Plenty of rear legroom IMO and with one front seat passenger I can get a 6piece drum kit, two bags of stands, cymbals, a Marshall 4×12 cab & separate head and two or three guitars in it. Tailgate is plenty wide enough and has the advantage of split tailgate for smaller loads or restricted space. It’s showing on mostly twisty country lanes with a bit of urban mileage thrown in. Front wheel drive most of the time but the rear wheels kick in automatically when (if) the front wheels start to spin. Handy on occasional snow between Otley & Ripon. Makes not a jot of difference to braking on ice or snow Posted 5 years ago Kuga has pretty large exterior dimensions. Quite a nice place to be. Quick in a straight line but wallowy in corners is apparently the sporty bit of Suv. The boot lip is flat, so the utility bit of sUv is covered and it’s definitely a vehicle. Fortunately it was a company car, if it were my money I wouldn’t. From the list it’s the best of a bad bunch. Posted 5 years ago Agreed it’s a big car but most of the bigness is in the height – about same length & width as the Focus it’s based on but I’m 5’8″ and I can just about see over the roof Posted 5 years ago Agreed it’s a big car but most of the bigness is in the height – about same length & width as the Focus it’s based on but I’m 5’8″ and I can just about see over the roof Not a chance, unless the Ford page proves me wrong, I’ll say the Focus I was driving before the Kuga fitted in parking spaces (Charles St Manchester) where the Kuga wouldn’t. Even the C-max is a touch shorter and I also imagine narrower. Posted 5 years ago I don’t know Manchester but I have no problem parking it in Bradford or Leeds. Certainly shorter than the 320d Touring and 9-3 Sportwagon I’ve had before it, my drive tells me so as there’s now a wheelie bin behind it & it still fits Posted 5 years ago We bought our 14 plate C-max auto Titanium over 18 months ago to replace the 57 plate 2-zetec auto we`d had for 5 years The differnce is staggering the old petrol turned tops on a run ,the new one does close to 40 round town and ive seen returns of over 55mpg on good motorway runs over the uk limit 🙂 And it doesnt hang about , big enough for the 2+2 family and all the mod cons , sensors all over the shop ,electric everything , and when the boss isnt using it easy to chuck 3 bikes in the back with wheels off and 3 packs , we did look at the Kuga and glad we turned it down as a friend bought the fame spec as ours and struggles to get 32 around town and tops out at 45 on a run Posted 5 years ago Pretty sure the original c-max is based on the same floorpan as the mk2 focus estate (or the mk2 focus is on a c-max if you treat it chronologically). So it should be the same size. Not sure if it’s entirely right but the mk2 focus estate was smaller than the mk1, and my c-max boot isnt as big as my parents old mk1 focus estate. It is however undeniably taller. Doesnt stop me being a bit entusiastic on b-roads, its not a focus RS, but its a long way from rolling arround like a berlingo or “drives just like a car” T5. Posted 5 years ago Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total) The topic ‘Kuga v Cmax v Grand Cmax – help me decide’ is closed to new replies. Thanks for popping by - why not stay a while?IT'S FREESign up as a Singletrack Member and you can leave comments on stories, use the classified ads, and post in our forums, do quizzes and us, join in, it’s free, and fun. silnik diesla ( ilość produktów: 14 ) Producent: model Forda: Focus II (2004-2008), Focus II (2008-2011), Focus III (2011-2015), Focus C-Max (2003-2007), C-Max (2007-2010), C-Max / Grand C-Max (2010-2015), Kuga I (2008-2012), Kuga II (2012-2020), C-Max / Grand C-Max (2015-2019), Focus III FL (2014-2018), Mondeo V (2014->), Galaxy IV (2015->), S-Max II (2015->), Edge II (2016->), Galaxy III (2006-2015), Mondeo IV (2007-2014), S-Max (2006-2015)pojemność / typ silnika: napinacz paska wieloklinowego TDCi - 1690293 DEFiesta, Focus MK2, Mk3, C-Max, Mondeo MK4, Mk5, S-Max / Galaxy, B-Max, Kuga, Fusion, Transity silniki diesla: / / TDCI139,00 zł / napinacz paska wieloklinowego TDCi - Febi 22369Fiesta, Focus MK2, Mk3, C-Max, Mondeo MK4, Mk5, S-Max / Galaxy, B-Max, Kuga, Fusion, Transity silniki diesla: / / TDCI119,50 zł / napinacz paska wieloklinowego Ford TDCi - AV6Q-6A228-ABFiesta, Focus MK2, Mk3, C-Max, Mondeo MK4, Mk5, S-Max / Galaxy, B-Max, Kuga, Fusion, Transity silniki diesla: / / TDCI zamiennik oryginału: 1690293135,00 zł / Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: model Forda: pojemność / typ silnika: Producent: Producent: Focus II, III, C-Max, Grand C-Max, Kuga I, II, Transit/Tourneo Connect II/ BV6T-2C204-FB Producent: ATEKod produktu: w sklepie stacjonarnym 66,00 złŁatwy zwrot towaru Kupuj i sprawdź spokojnie w domu. W ciągu 14 dni możesz odstąpić od umowy bez podania przyczyny. Pokaż szczegóły 14 dni na odstąpienie od umowy Najważniejsza jest Twoja satysfakcja z zakupów. Zamówione u nas produkty możesz zwrócić w ciągu 14 dni bez podania przyczyny. Bez stresu i obawDbamy o Twoją wygodę, dlatego w naszym sklepie dokonasz zwrotu na korzystnych kreator zwrotówWszystkie zwroty w naszym sklepie obsługiwane są przez prosty kreator zwrotów, który daje możliwość odesłania do nas paczki zwrotnej. Czujnik prędkości obrotowej koła (tzw. czujnik abs). Oś przednia, strona lewa lub prawa. - Ford Focus II roczniki od 06-12-2010 do 29-07-2011 (układ ABS na wszystkie koła) - Ford Focus III roczniki od 03-01-2011 do 21-07-2015 - Ford Focus III roczniki od 06-10-2014-> - Ford C-Max / Grand C-Max roczniki od 05-01-2011 -> - Ford C-Max / Grand C-Max roczniki od 13-04-2015 -> - Ford Kuga Iroczniki od 06-12-2010 do - Ford Kuga IIroczniki od 05-11-2012 -> - Ford Transit/Tourneo Connect roczniki od 30-09-2013 -> zamiennik oryginału Ford: 1690865 - BV6T-2C204-FA1847581 - BV6T-2C204-FB nr fabryczny: BV6T-2C204-FB, BV6T-2C204-FA Parametry techniczne: model Forda:C-Max / Grand C-Max (2010-2015), C-Max / Grand C-Max (2015-2019), Focus II (2008-2011), Focus III FL (2014-2018), Kuga I (2008-2012), Kuga II (2012-2020), Transit / Tourneo Connect II (2013->)Przód / Tył:przódHamulce - wybierz grupę:pozostałeOE / zamiennik:oryginał Opinie naszych klientów Aby móc ocenić produkt lub dodać opinię, musisz być zalogowany. Compare two cars 2009. - 2013. M - MPV MPV, 5 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2010. - 2015. M - MPV MPV, 5 door front Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2009 Peugeot 3008 2010 Ford C-Max © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Diesel 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Diesel 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. Considering they both belong to the mpv segment and utilize the same 5-door MPV body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific diesel engine choice they offer. Both the engines are Peugeot-engineered . The first one has a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 110hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 114hp one. Safety A starting point here would be to take a look at the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests which were performed on both of the cars, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Both vehicles belong to the mpv segment, which is generally a good thing safety-wise, but that fact doesn't break the tie between the two cars. Furthermore, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, the French car offers a marginal difference of 9% more metal. Reliability Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, at least on all of the models level. These are the official statistics, while our visitors describe reliability of Peugeot with an average rating of and models under the Ford badge with out of 5. The same official information place 3008 as average reliability-wise, and C-Max is more or less at the same should definitely mention that owners of cars with the same powertrain as the French car rank it on average as out of 5, exactly the same as the other one. Performance & Fuel economy Ford is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 184 kilometers per hour, 4km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy the winner has to be the American car, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (64 mpg), in combined cycle. We can't ignore that 16% difference compared to the French car. Verdict Peugeot appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the French car offers slightly better overall protection and takes the lead. From there things take a different direction, with Ford offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! It's not difficult to say then that if I'd need to make a choice, it would definitely be the Ford. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. Also, you could use the oportunity to find out which car, everything taken into account, would be the perfect choice for you in the eyes of the virtual adviser™, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles. Check a car by its VIN number Bringing car spotting into perspective Real height1 m 2 + cm 1 m Real height1 + cm 2 m Real width2 1 m Real width2 Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer. Rear ViewFord C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003 vs. Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012 Technical specs | Ford C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003 is cm narrower and cm lower compared to Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012. It offers 2% less cargo 1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down Quick Facts 721801 Comparison combinations Germany Origin of the most car models 1908 Year of our oldest car model

ford kuga vs c max